Crime Is on Increase Essays

Crime Is on Increase Essays Crime Is on Increase Essay Crime Is on Increase Essay Crime is on increase Unorganized society commonly caused by many reasons especially the vandalism that leads to unexpected crimes. As we know that, the number of crime committed is increasing day by day while there are also the varieties of its consequences as well as the solutions. In the next paragraphs, both causes and effects of crime will be discussed after one anther which will also be followed by the beneficial solutions. One of the causes of crime is the poor parenting skill which simply refers to the dysfunction of the family; divorce is the best match example that most of the children will definitely bring their feedback after its occurrence. By doing so, they will easily become the victim and thus commit the crime immediately. Similarly, fatherlessness also contributes to criminal activities after one has withdrawn oneself from the others or accidentally taken up with gangsters. Usually, they start either being absent or dropping out of school clustering their own friends into a small group and end up doing something for fun; the reasons behind their reaction is because of the ignorance of the parents toward them, so they will be automatically upset sometimes even lonely that they had to hang out with friends in order to get rid of boredom. Another significant cause that cannot be blamed for is the poverty throughout their whole life. Having nothing will sooner or later form the ambition which is the creation of greed; consequently, the poor will be the volunteers in any group works without thinking twice if it is a legal affair. No matter how many bad things they have done, they will try their best to earn the money for their own sake to put themselves equal as the people surrounded them for both position and wealth. Therefore, they will happily enjoy their life which has always been praying for. Yet all they have to do to be rich in a blink of an eye; for instance, a drug seller whose job is to sell the illegal drug for addictive gangsters. If one refuses to get involved in such a business, possibly means that he or she is trying to drive the luck away and having no interest in searching for a good chance to be the well-off person. There are even much more causes of crime which occurred daily while there are also many solutions at the same time. Firstly, there should be a reformation of the system especially education must be put on the first hand due to the fact that it helps people gaining knowledge for making better decision. Once education has been improved, there will be the varieties of employment provided by the local firms; searching for the qualified candidates to be the permanent member of its business activities. Hence, higher salary will be provided without hesitation if that candidate is the right person for recruitment; in addition, he or she is able to improve their living standard by having not only the money to get what they want, but also the reputation of being the rich. The last solution to deals with criminal activities is the punishment which is strengthened by law to scare away those who love committing crimes. The more criminal activities they have done, the more serious punishment they will get. In this case, it includes two different kind of punishments such as: the less serious punishment is to fine the money which is the law set by the local government, the more serious punishment is to sentence in prison many years according to the degree of how serious the crime is. With these solutions, there will be the automatic reduction of crime rate for sure. In conclusion, problem will be solved after its solutions have already found and used. Just like a quote says God never created a lock without its fixed keys. Solving problem is far different from taking an exam, taking exam, students need to complete the space where answers are required unless they know nothing, whereas you have to be flexible to deal with the problem confidentially and of course cannot skip any tasks at all; otherwise, something bad will happen continuously after one another.

Appealing to Tradition Fallacy

Appealing to Tradition Fallacy Fallacy Name: Appeal to AgeAlternative Names:argumentum ad antiquitatemAppeal to TraditionAppeal to CustomAppeal to Common PracticeCategory: Appeals to Emotion and Desire Explanation of the Appeal to Age Fallacy The Appeal to Age fallacy goes in the opposite direction from the Appeal to Novelty fallacy by arguing that when something is old, then this somehow enhances the value or truth of the proposition in question. The Latin for Appeal to Age is argumentum ad antiquitatem, and the most common form is: 1. It is old or long-used, so it must better than this new-fangled stuff. People have a strong tendency towards conservatism; that is to say, people have a tendency to preserve practices and habits which seem to work rather than replace them with new ideas. Sometimes this may be due to laziness, and sometimes it may simply be a matter of efficiency. In general, though, its probably a product of evolutionary success because habits which allowed for survival in the past wont be abandoned too quickly or easily in the present. Sticking with something that works isnt a problem; insisting on a certain way of doing things simply because its traditional or old is a problem and, in a logical argument, it is a fallacy. Examples of the Appeal to Age Fallacy One common use of an Appeal to Age fallacy is when trying to justify something which cant be defended on actual merits, like, for example, discrimination or bigotry: 2. Its standard practice to pay men more than women so well continue adhering to the same standards this company has always followed.3. Dog fighting is a sport thats been around for hundreds if not thousands of years. Our ancestors enjoyed it and it has become part of our heritage.4. My mother always put sage in the turkey stuffing so I do it too. While its true that the practices in question have been around for a long time, no reason for continuing these practices are given; instead, its simply assumed that old, traditional practices should be continued. There isnt even any attempt to explain and defend why these practices existed in the first place, and thats important because it might reveal that the circumstances which originally produced these practices have changed enough to warrant dropping those practices. There are quite a few people out there who are under the mistaken impression that the age of an item, and that alone, is indicative of its value and usefulness. Such an attitude is not entirely without warrant. Just as it is true that a new product can provide new benefits, it is also true that something older may have value because it has worked for a long time. It isnt true that we can assume, without further question, that an old object or practice is valuable simply because it is old. Perhaps it has been used a lot because no one has ever known or tried any better. Perhaps new and better replacements are absent because people have accepted a fallacious Appeal to Age. If there are sound, valid arguments in defense of some traditional practice, then they should be offered, and it should be demonstrated that it is, in fact, superior to newer alternatives. Appeal to Age and Religion Its also easy to find fallacious appeals to age in the context of religion. Indeed, it would probably be hard to find a religion which doesnt use the fallacy at least some of the time because its rare to find a religion which doesnt rely heavily on tradition as part of how it enforces various doctrines. Pope Paul VI wrote in 1976 in Response to the Letter of His Grace the Most Reverend Dr. F.D. Coggan, Archbishop of Canterbury, concerning the Ordination of Women to the Priesthood: 5. [The Catholic Church] holds that it is not admissible to ordain women to the priesthood for very fundamental reasons. These reasons include: the example recorded in the Sacred Scriptures of Christ choosing his Apostles only from among men; the constant practice of the Church, which has imitated Christ in choosing only men; and her living teaching authority which has consistently held that the exclusion of women from the priesthood is in accordance with Gods plan for his Church. Three arguments are offered by Pope Paul VI in defense of keeping women out of the priesthood. The first appeals to the Bible and isnt an Appeal to Age fallacy. The second and third are so explicit as fallacies that they could be cited in textbooks: we should keep doing this because its how the church has constantly done it and because what church authority has consistently decreed. Put more formally, his argument is: Premise 1: The constant practice of the Church has been to choose only men as priests.Premise 2: The teaching authority of the Church has consistently held that women should be excluded from the priesthood.Conclusion: Therefore, it is not admissible to ordain women to the priesthood. The argument may not use the words age or tradition, but the use of constant practice and consistently create the same fallacy.